XL Capital (XL) is a company that the market loves to hate. Its stock price has plummeted by 94% over the last twelve months, mainly over concerns about its investment portfolio. (For a more in-depth discussion of XL’s past troubles, please see my article from November 25th, “Reinsurer Stocks: A Fear-Driven Market Creates Opportunity.”) The stock could tick up a bit in connection with the unwinding of hedges related to forward share purchase contracts that settle on February 17th. The company’s fourth quarter earnings call on February 11th could also bring positive news that lifts share prices, perhaps accelerating the hedge unwinds, and potentially leading to further short covering.
Short interest in XL stock is the highest of all commercial lines insurance companies as a percentage of float, at 9.3%, according to a recent Credit Suisse report. One might be tempted to view this as a sign that many investors believe the stock is headed to zero soon. However, there is more to this story.
Most of these short sales are likely to be hedges rather than speculative plays. XL has entered into forward sale agreements on up to 47.4 million common shares. Much of the current short interest of 30.5 million shares is probably related to hedges of these agreements.
Equity Security Units
The forward purchase/sale agreements are part of $1.32 billion of outstanding “Equity Security Units” comprised of:
• $745 million of 7% Equity Security Units sold on December 9, 2005 (prospectus), and
• $575 million of 10.75% Equity Security Units sold on August 5, 2008 (prospectus).
Each unit consists of a portion of a note and a contract to purchase a like amount of common shares at a minimum price. The minimum price to be paid by holders of the 7% units is $65 per share. Quite a premium compared to today’s price of under $3 per share!
The Equity Security Units are a bit complicated, but essentially what happens is that on the “settlement date,” the unit holders are required to purchase shares of common stock at some price between the minimum price and a maximum threshold price. At the same time, the related notes are remarketed. That is, they are reoffered for sale at a new interest rate intended to bring the price (net of a small remarketing fee) back to par. If the notes are successfully remarketed, the unit holders use the proceeds of the remarketing to fulfill their common stock purchase obligations. If the notes are not successfully remarketed, XL can use the notes to fund the common stock purchases. Thus, from XL’s perspective, the worst case is that the units act like convertible debt that converts on the settlement date. The best case is that the notes remain outstanding after a successful remarketing, and the purchased common stock is incremental new capital.
Partial Hedge Unwind Coming
The settlement date for the 7% units is February 17, 2009. The unit holders will be required to purchase an aggregate of 11.46 million common shares for $65.00 per share, or $745 million in total. (XL hired Goldman Sachs to remarket the notes. To the extent they are successful, the common share purchase will constitute incremental capital. If Goldman is not successful, the notes will effectively “convert” into common at $65 per share – adding to common equity but not total capital.)
The chart below shows that less than half of the 7% units were hedged while the common stock was trading well above the minimum forward price. As the stock price broke through $65 per share, short interest grew, reaching about 12 million shares as the price passed through $40 per share. At that point, the 7% units were probably fully hedged. Short interest popped up by over 10 million shares, to approximately 25 million shares, when the 10.75% units were issued. Short interest approached its current level of 30.5 million shares last October, as the stock price fell below $10 per share.
If all $745 million of stock purchase obligations related to the 7% units are hedged with short sales, short interest should decline by at least 11.5 million shares near the contract settlement date of February 17th. The stock could see some upward pressure as these short sales are covered, although the impact would be small, as the covered shorts would represent just over 1x average daily trading volume.
The impact from short covering could be eclipsed by reactions to the company’s fourth quarter earnings announcement on February 10th and analyst call on February 11th.
XL’s shares reached a low closing price of $2.68 last December after the company announced that mark-to-market and impairment losses on its investment portfolio as of December 10th would be consistent with amounts for the prior quarter, or approximately $1.1 billion, and, as a result (i) analysts cut prices targets significantly, and (ii) S&P, Moody’s, and Fitch cut XL’s ratings again.
The main reason for the negative action by sell-side analysts was concern that additional investment losses could lead to a need to raise dilutive capital. As for the ratings cuts, these actually seemed to be driven less by potential balance sheet issues (although these were cited, of course) than by a concern that the company’s financial problems could have damaged its reputation to the point that it could lose a meaningful amount of business at January 1 renewals and beyond, or that it would need to under-price business to retain it, or both.
After rising to $4.69 per share on January 9th, the stock has retested its $2.68 December low. At this price, which is only about 0.15x book value, the bad news is once again priced in. It would take a large negative surprise to drive shares down significantly, and anything short of disastrous news should send shares higher.
It does not seem likely that investment losses will exceed last December’s guidance. Market prices for many classes of securities held by XL – such as high-grade corporates and securities backed by subprime loans and commercial real estate loans – were higher at year-end than at the time XL provided guidance. Thus, investment losses might come in slightly better than expected. However, it is more likely that any benefits from lower rates and tighter spreads are offset by additional marks on other asset classes, such as investments in hedge funds.
It is difficult to predict XL’s Q4 revenue and operating profit, and to know how well XL fared in January renewals. However, there is no indication that XL’s business has fallen off substantially. According to Business Insurance (article), XL’s policyholders are not abandoning the company (although they are watching things carefully), and XL is being offered the opportunity to bid on new business. However, Business Insurance implied that D&O coverage could be one area where XL may be more vulnerable.
This is consistent with what other insurers have been saying on recent earnings calls. Some companies have mentioned that risk managers have not been as willing to move business as they had expected. However, ACE Ltd. (ACE) said that its D&O business has benefited from a significant “flight to quality.” It is not clear if this has come at the expense of AIG, XL or both.
So far, financial results announced by competitors have been mixed. However, 2009 guidance has been consistently positive. Pricing appears to be more rational overall, and has firmed slightly in most lines of business. Expectations are for further improvement throughout the year.
According to the company’s website, the median analyst estimate for Q4 EPS is $0.35 and the median estimate of book value per share is $21.65, about flat with the prior quarter. Bloomberg shows consensus estimates of $0.43 for adjusted EPS and $19.36 for BV/shr. The latter BV/shr figure is more consistent with management’s December guidance on investment losses. Book value could be reduced further by the impact of a stronger dollar.
On the February 11th call, management should be able to make a convincing argument that the franchise is still very much alive, and that profitable growth will be forthcoming in 2009. If the company surprises on the upside, positive movement in the stock could be enhanced by some short covering beyond the unwinding of hedges on the 7% Equity Security Units.
(Disclosure: the author is long XL, as well as ACE, AXS, PRE and VR)
February 6, 2009 at 9:09 am
I have been asked if I expect a short squeeze. The short answer (pun intended) is no. In general, if a short sale is a hedge of a future purchase of new issue shares, covering the short is unlikely to move the stock price because the short can be covered by new shares rather than market purchases. In the case of XL, it is hard to know what amount of short interest is related to hedges, and if the unwind of hedges will result in a need to cover short sales that is less than, equal to, or greater than the 11.46 million new shares to be issued.
The more important thing fundamentally is that the 7% units increase the company’s equity capital by $745 million, which is good (although book value per share increases only slightly because of the increase in shares). If the related notes are remarketed successfully, total capital increases by $745 million as well, which is even better.
February 9, 2009 at 11:51 am
Hi John & Thanks for info.
Would you say that 20 million of the 30 million shorts outstanding could be related to the shares that come out of the 10.75% Equity Security Units sold on August 5, 2008?
If so, most of the shorts on XL are protecting shares they will be (could be) assigned out of these issues.
For long shareholders that’s even less potential pent up demand for shares if share prices go up.
For those selling naked shorts on XL, they have a lot less company than they thought.
Could XL buy at these low levels to sell to buyers of this issue at the higher preset levels?
If so, how would they have to account for those share till they put them?
Is put price range $16 – $18.88 ?
An interesting observation, if true.
Interested in your views & thanks.
February 9, 2009 at 1:31 pm
It’s hard to say what amount of the short interest could be related to the 10.75% units. From the chart included in the post, I would guess that the number is closer to 10MM than 20MM, but that’s only a guess. It’s also very hard to know what one would do if they’ve shorted the stock as a hedge but at some point feel that the stock has bottomed…. Interesting question about repurchasing shares. In more normal times, I would think a share repurchase could make sense, but given how dear liquidity and equity capital are these days, I don’t think a share repurchase is likely.